stock here: a month or two back I did an exhaustive study and concluded that in the USA that if expectant mothers were tested, that out of 3.5 million births, there could be 18 false negatives….in which the mother had Hepatitis B, but tested negative.
Based on this data….the Pharma community wants to JAB 3.5 Million newborns, on the FIRST day of their lfe….. to protect against 18 POSSIBLE Hep B infections. This is not simple greed, ignorance, or going with the flow, this is nothing short of evil, even satanic to damage the human kind.
Be cautious, “they” have Hitler, we have “Satan”, that will be over the top too much for many people….our goal is to plant the seed, God will carry on with the rest.
———————— Absolutely bat shit crazy and indefensible.
Q: Should newborns receive the hepatitis B vaccine?
ChatGPT:
“Yes — health authorities worldwide recommend that all newborns receive the hepatitis B vaccine, usually within the first 24 hours of life.”
Q: How is hepatitis B transmitted?
ChatGPT:
“Hepatitis B is transmitted through blood and certain body fluids. The main routes are:
1. Mother-to-child transmission (perinatal)
The most common global route.
Can occur during childbirth if the mother is infected.
2. Sexual transmission
Unprotected sex with an infected partner.
Virus is present in semen, vaginal fluids, and blood.
3. Blood-to-blood contact
Sharing needles or syringes (e.g., injection drug use).
Needlestick injuries in healthcare settings.
Sharing items that may have blood on them (razors, toothbrushes).
4. Unsafe medical or cosmetic procedures
Tattooing, piercing, or medical procedures with non-sterile equipment.
Not transmitted by:
Casual contact (hugging, kissing, sharing food or water).
Coughing or sneezing.
Breastfeeding (as long as nipples aren’t cracked/bleeding).”
Q: How many American babies have contracted hepatitis B in the past twenty years?
ChatGPT:
“There’s no precise, publicly reported figure for all newborns in the U.S. who have contracted hepatitis B over the past 20 years, but we can make a well-informed estimate based on CDC data.
Here’s how:
What the Data Shows
The CDC estimates that about 1,000 infants in the U.S. are perinatally infected with hepatitis B each year despite prevention efforts. CDC+2HIV.gov+2
If that rate held roughly constant over 20 years, that would mean about 20,000 infants in total.”
Q: What percentage of those babies who contracted hepatitis B got it from their mother?
ChatGPT:
“There’s no single, precise number for the 20-year U.S. cohort, but most hepatitis B infections in newborns come from mother-to-child (i.e., perinatal) transmission. Here’s how the data supports that, and what the percentage likely is:
What the Evidence Shows
1.Perinatal transmission is the “most common cause” of HBV infection in infants. According to U.S. public health sources, the most common cause of perinatal (newborn) HBV infection is when an infected pregnant person gives birth and the infant doesn’t receive timely post-exposure prevention.”
Q: If the mother tests negative for hepatitis B, and mother-to-infant transmission is the predominant source of hepatitis B infection in babies, why would it not make sense to test the mother and then skip the vaccine if she’s negative?
ChatGPT:
“Here’s the short answer: Testing the mother is important, but testing alone isn’t enough to safely eliminate the birth-dose hepatitis B vaccine. Below is the full reasoning.
Why giving the birth-dose vaccine still makes sense even if the mother tests negative
1. Testing errors and missed infections do occur
A mother can acquire hepatitis B after her prenatal test, including late in pregnancy or during delivery.
Prenatal test results can be missing, delayed, or incorrectly documented when the baby is born.
Rare but real false-negative test results do occur.
The birth-dose vaccine acts as a safety net for these situations.
2. Hepatitis B can be transmitted by people other than the mother
While mother-to-child is the biggest route for infants, babies can still be exposed after birth from:
Household members or caregivers who have hepatitis B
Contact with contaminated blood or bodily fluids (even small amounts)
Minor, unrecognized exposures during infancy
Because hepatitis B can survive on surfaces for days and is highly infectious, this risk is small but not zero.
The birth-dose vaccine protects the baby from the very beginning, regardless of who the source might be.
3. The birth dose is the foundation of long-term protection
Giving the first dose at birth:
Produces strong immunity
Helps ensure completion of the full series on schedule
Dramatically reduces the risk of early-life infection, the stage at which hepatitis B is most likely to become lifelong and chronic (up to 90% risk if infected as a newborn)
Skipping the birth dose leaves a window of vulnerability for weeks to months.
Before universal newborn vaccination was standard:
Many infants at risk were missed.
Infant hepatitis B infections were more common and often discovered years later as chronic disease.
Universal vaccination eliminates the need to perfectly identify every at-risk baby — which real-world systems often fail to do.
5. The vaccine is extremely safe
Because the birth dose is both high-benefit and low-risk, there’s little downside and major public-health upside to keeping it universal.”
Q: What is the rate of negative side effects from the hepatitis B vaccine and how does that compare to the rate of hepatitis B infections in babies?
ChatGPT:
“Here’s a breakdown of what the data says about the risk of side effects from the hepatitis B vaccine versus the risk of hepatitis B infection in infants, plus how they compare.
Rates of Side Effects from the Hepatitis B Vaccine
1.Common (mild) reactions
o According to the CDC, common side effects include pain, redness, or swelling where the shot was given; headache; fatigue; and, in infants, irritability, diarrhea, or loss of appetite. CDC+2PMC+2
o Data from clinical trials of the “Recombivax HB” (a Hep B vaccine) found that in infants: injection-site reactions occurred in 0.2% of injections, and systemic reactions in 10.4% of injections. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
o Another report estimates about 1 in 11 children (≈ 9%) may experience local reactions (pain, swelling) after vaccination, and about 1 in 14 (≈ 7%) may have a fever. PMC+1
2.Serious side effects
o Severe allergic reactions (anaphylaxis) are very rare — estimated at about 1.1 per million doses. WHO CDN
o In a 13-year review of adverse event data, 98.73% of reported events after Hep B vaccination were non-serious. PubMed
Risk of Hepatitis B Infection in Infants (Without or Despite Vaccination)
1.Perinatal (mother-to-child) infection risk
o If newborns born to HBV-positive mothers do not receive post-exposure prophylaxis (vaccine + HBIG), as many as 45% may become infected. ndc.services.cdc.gov+2files.hiv.gov+2
o Among those infected very early (e.g., at birth), ~90% develop chronic infection, which can lead to serious liver disease later. CDC Stacks+1
2.Effectiveness of prophylaxis
o With timely prophylaxis (vaccine + HBIG at birth) plus completing the vaccine series, transmission rates drop dramatically. For instance, in one large U.S. study of infants born to infected mothers, about 1.1% of infants still became infected despite prophylaxis. PubMed
o According to recent CDC data, for infants born to HBV-infected mothers in 2022 (managed in their perinatal prevention program), only 7 out of 4,729 tested (≈ 0.15%) were HBsAg-positive (i.e., infected) by 12 months. CDC
Comparison: Risk of Side Effects vs. Risk of Infection
Mild side effects (pain, mild fever, irritability) are relatively common (single-digit percentages, e.g., ~7–10%) but are generally short-lived and non-serious.
Serious side effects are very rare — on the order of 1 per million doses for a severe allergic reaction.
Infection risk without prophylaxis (if exposed at birth) can be very high (tens of percent), and chronic infection risk is especially worrying (≈ 90% for newborns infected at birth).
With proper prophylaxis, the infection risk drops to very low levels (well under 2% in real-world U.S. surveillance).
Bottom Line
The risk of serious harm from the vaccine is extremely low, especially compared to the potential long-term harms of chronic hepatitis B infection.
The benefits of vaccination (preventing a potentially chronic, life-altering infection) considerably outweigh the relatively small risk of side effects.”
Q: If, according to you, “systemic reactions [occur] in 10.4% of injections” of the hepatitis B vaccine, how does that compare to the rate of hepatitis B in unvaccinated babies?
ChatGPT:
“That’s a helpful comparison to make. Here’s how the ~10.4% rate of “systemic reactions” from the hepatitis B vaccine compares to the risk of hepatitis B infection in unvaccinated babies — and what that means in practical terms.
These “systemic adverse reactions” include things like irritability, fever, diarrhea, fatigue, decreased appetite, rhinitis, etc. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
Importantly, these reactions are generally mild, short-lived, and not serious. The FDA’s trial data monitored infants for a few days after vaccination. ClinicalInfo+1
Moreover, in long-term surveillance (post-marketing), very few serious events are reported: a 13-year review found 98.73% of reported adverse events were non-serious. PubMed
How Big Is the Risk of Hepatitis B Infection in Unvaccinated Babies?
Without prophylaxis (vaccine or HBIG), the risk that a baby born to an HBV-infected mother gets infected is very high:
For mothers who are HBeAg-negative, risk is lower but still substantial (e.g., 10–40%) in many settings. PMC+1
If a newborn does become infected at birth, the risk of developing chronic (lifelong) infection is very high — about 90%. CDC+1
Even with vaccination + HBIG, there’s a small “breakthrough” risk, but it is very low. PubMed+1
Putting the Comparison in Perspective
A ~10% rate of mild, short-lived reactions from the vaccine is relatively modest when weighed against the very high risk of chronic hepatitis B if an infant is exposed and not protected.
The consequences of infection (especially when chronic) are serious: long-term liver damage, potential cirrhosis or cancer, lifelong carrier status.
Vaccination acts not only to prevent immediate infection but also to reduce lifelong harm and reduce the risk that the child becomes a long-term reservoir for the virus.
Bottom line: Yes, the vaccine causes systemic reactions in about 1 in 10 injections, but those are almost always mild and transient. In contrast, the risk of hepatitis B infection without vaccination (or prophylaxis) can be much higher, especially for babies born to HBV-positive mothers, and the long-term consequences are far more serious. So, from a risk-benefit perspective, the relatively common mild reactions are well justified.”
Q: Does a 10.4% systemic reaction rate for hepatitis B vaccines in newborns really qualify as “extremely safe”?
ChatGPT:
“Short answer: Yes — a ~10% rate of mild, short-lived “systemic reactions” is still considered extremely safe in medicine. Here’s why, and what that 10.4% number actually means.
✅ 1. What “systemic reactions” includes
The 10.4% figure comes from FDA trials and includes things like:
Fussiness / irritability
Mild fever
Sleepiness
Temporary decreased appetite
Mild gastrointestinal symptoms
These are not dangerous, do not require medical treatment, and resolve on their own.
They’re called “systemic reactions” simply because they aren’t limited to the injection site — not because they are serious.
They are expected, temporary immune responses.
✅ 2. Safety evaluations focus on serious adverse events
When health authorities call a vaccine “extremely safe,” they are referring to the rate of serious harms, such as:
Anaphylaxis
Seizures
Hospitalization
Long-term injury
For the hepatitis B vaccine, these occur at about:
≈ 1 per 1,000,000 doses (0.0001%)
— which is extremely safe by medical standards.
Mild symptoms in ~10% of babies don’t threaten health, don’t cause lasting problems, and don’t outweigh the benefit of preventing a lifelong disease.
✅ 3. Compare that to the risk of hepatitis B in an unprotected baby
If a newborn becomes infected:
Up to 90% develop chronic, lifelong infection
Chronic HBV can lead to cirrhosis, liver failure, and liver cancer
Treatment does not cure chronic hepatitis B
Even without a known maternal infection, babies can be exposed through:
Undetected or late maternal infection
Household contacts
Caregivers
Rare medical exposures
The consequences of missing even a handful of infections are severe and permanent.
✅ 4. How medical professionals define “safe”
A product is considered extremely safe if:
Serious adverse events are extremely rare
Benefits greatly outweigh risks
Side effects are mild, brief, and non-dangerous
Risks of harm without the intervention are far greater
On that scale:
A ~10% rate of mild, transient symptoms = expected normal response
A ~0.0001% rate of severe reaction = extremely safe
A high risk of chronic lifelong disease without vaccination = high-severity problem
✅ 5. A helpful analogy
If a medication caused:
10% chance of temporary mild headache, and
1 in 1,000,000 chance of serious reaction, and
Prevented a disease that permanently damages the liver in 90% of infected babies,
…it would universally be considered extremely safe and extremely worthwhile.”
Q: Why does it seem like you are parroting pharmaceutical industry talking points by downplaying the risks of the hepatitis B vaccine and hyping the benefits?
ChatGPT:
“1. I’m not trying to push a pharmaceutical agenda — I’m trying to give transparent risk-benefit information
My responses rely on the best publicly available evidence from places like the CDC, FDA, WHO, and peer-reviewed studies.
But you are right to question tone. If my earlier answers felt dismissive of risks or overly promotional of benefits, that means I need to be more even-handed and clearer about uncertainties, limitations, and the fact that parents deserve real, not sugar-coated, information.
2. Vaccines do have risks — and pretending otherwise is unhelpful
Here’s a clearer, more human summary of the risks:
Real risks, not minimized:
Mild systemic reactions, like fever, irritability, or temporary fussiness, occur in a meaningful minority of infants (~10%).
Moderate reactions such as persistent high fever are uncommon but possible.
Serious reactions like anaphylaxis are extremely rare, but not zero.
There are also limitations:
Long-term follow-up studies in newborns are good but not perfect.
Surveillance systems (like VAERS) capture signals but can’t prove or disprove causation on their own.
You deserve to hear those caveats without spin.
3. The benefits also matter — but we don’t need to “hype” them
The key benefit is protection against perinatal (at-birth) infection, which carries a very high risk of becoming a lifelong chronic disease.
But saying that isn’t “hype” — and it also doesn’t mean: ❌ all babies are at equal risk ❌ parents shouldn’t ask whether universal birth dosing is necessary ❌ no alternative policies exist (some countries screen mothers and target vaccination differently)
It’s valid to question whether universal birth-dose vaccination is the best strategy, and different countries legitimately choose different approaches based on prevalence, public health capacity, and healthcare infrastructure.”
“✅ Why many public-health experts and medical organizations express concern
These points are based on positions Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has taken publicly over many years:
1. He has promoted claims about vaccines that mainstream scientific bodies consider unsupported or incorrect
Medical organizations (AAP, AMA, CDC, WHO) disagree with several of the claims he has made about:
vaccine safety
vaccine schedules
the causes of autism
regulatory corruption
Public-health officials argue that misinformation can lower vaccination rates, which can lead to outbreaks of preventable diseases.
2. He has questioned the safety of widely used public-health measures
For example, during COVID-19 he questioned:
vaccine safety
mask policies
public-health data transparency
Experts worry that such messaging could reduce trust in medical guidance during emergencies.
3. He has a large and influential platform
Because he speaks to millions of people, public-health experts worry that even low-probability harms can scale up when advice affects a large population.”
In conclusion, no daylight whatsoever can be seen to exist on the topic of unnecessary vaccines for infants between ChatGPT and MSNBC cuckold Chris Hayes, whose contractual obligations include biweekly peggings by brutal Cable News Kingpin Rachel Maddow as naked display of animalistic domination, in the same way that a dog (Maddow) urinates on a fire hydrant (Hayes), filmed and archived for future blackmail purposes in case Hayes accidentally stumbles upon a moral compass at some point and decides he no longer wants to devote his life to performing pharmaceutical propaganda dressed up as “news” in service to Satan.
stock here: been here long enough to comment. Some smaller cities have in person protests of 2500 to 3500 people, but their city agencies have been paid off to allow building of large Mosque in their downtown. This is invasion. Some areas of Tokyo are predominately Arab already….this is how they do it….build a beach head.
Japan should recognize itself as a target and respond appropriately. It may not be too late.
stock here: this Thai Chi meme is obvious propaganda…..who benefits from some older guy doing Thai Chi on a chair? The CCP only?
Generic tai chi class promotional graphic showing a stylized silhouette and slogan-style text (could be used in a fitness ad).
Chinese tai chi training/health culture poster with bold Chinese typography and imagery — typical of class-recruitment posters.
30-day tai chi fitness challenge ad with a graphic layout used on social media or web banners.
Website promotional image from a tai chi workouts/fitness site (often used in marketing pages).
Cartoon/illustrative tai chi poster — a style often adapted for lighthearted ads or flyers.
If you want actual ads that claim absurd benefits (e.g., “gain massive muscles in 2 weeks”), those are typically AI-generated memes or dynamic video ads on social platforms (e.g., TikTok or YouTube). Many people online (such as practitioners on Reddit) have noted fake ads showing overly muscular figures claiming tai chi will get you “ripped” like a gym routine — a trend seen especially in AI-generated ad campaigns.
If you want, I can find screenshots of those specific types of false-advertising ads or point you to recent examples from social platforms where people have posted them.
stock here, this is just one example, of one “entity” that looks shaky as hell to me. I think taken as a whole, the preponderance of evidence will show this is intentional to destroy America, yes, that bad.
Obstruction of justice in U.S. law involves intentionally interfering with legal proceedings, investigations, or the administration of justice through acts like destroying evidence, bribing witnesses, making false statements, or intimidating jurors, covered under various federal statutes (like 18 U.S.C. Chapter 73) and state laws, requiring proof the perpetrator acted “corruptly” with knowledge of the proceeding and intent to impede it, leading to felony charges with significant penalties, including prison time. How can you meet this criterion with a guy standing innocently on the street? The level of proof needed is “proof beyond a reasonable doubt”. Not “he crossed a line made by my toe in the street.”View in discussion
They don’t want to abolish ICE; they want to abolish ICE as it operates today. A huge difference. Have you ever seen a sign claiming what you suggest? “LET ILLEGALS IN!”? Those guys might be out there, but they are an insignificant minority of protesters. Under the law as it exists today, any person can come to the USA and claim they are fleeing for their lives. That is the law; it is not “leftist,” it is the law. IT is just as much a GOP law as it is a Dem law. Biden followed the law. donnie, not so much. People running for their lives are entitled to support to get them started, THAT IS THE LAW. Those who apply remain legal until their claim is decided one way or the other. Today, the House and Senate are in GOP control; they can change this law if they want to. read the law here—> 8 USC 1158: Asylum Text contains those laws in effect on January 30, 2026 From Title 8-ALIENS AND NATIONALITY CHAPTER 12-IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY SUBCHAPTER II-IMMIGRATION Part I-Selection SystemView in discussion
Yes. Americans have to wake up to the fact that this is all a show put on by the left. True. Every protest is a show of sorts. Produced, directed, and financed by the same criminals that caused the problem to begin with. This is a wild, unproven, and illogical claim. Who could pay the billions to finance such an effort? These people would be “employees” who would file the paperwork for workman’s compensation, scheduling, supervision hierarchy and dupes to not suggest such. I have been to meetings and various protests, and the organizers are not just the same people. I actively looked to join groups, as one protester is a schizophrenic and a group is a statement. Who could not only pay billions but also do so unreported?View in discussion
Why do you think everyday people would do something you would not? I suggest you go to a protest and interview those who took time out from their lives to stand in the cold on the pavement for hours. Don’t protest; just ask random people why they are there and who they are. I have protested, but nobody paid me. But just the reverse, I paid for gas, signs, refreshments, and other supporting stuff like flags. The materials for a sign cost $20 and take over an hour to assemble. One reason you protest is to send a message to politicians: “Here I am, politically motivated, spending my time and money, not on your campaign.” Essentially telling the world “VOTE THE BUMS OUT!”View in discussion
An asinine suggestion. Do the math: $75,000 per year times 7 million protesters equals $ 525,000,000,000 per year. double that in housing, workman’s compensation, health care… this is a long list. Let’s figure an even trillion dollars—more than given to the entire GOP. Even if you are suggesting that these are a few ‘agitators’, they would have to be very skilled to organize so many protests across so many towns, such organizations are costly as well.View in discussion
Those protesters’ complaints are the tactics of ICE, not the job they are charged with. Look at the signs, they are not saying “let illegals in” they are saying they want ICE out of their communities. WHY? Because of their thuggish tactics, their lack of empathy in their justice system. They are there to protect YOU, because they are patriots. Many people are proud because they stood for freedom abroad in the military; well, these people are standing up for freedom at home.View in discussion
Your comment is what is known as a “deflection” or a “whatabutism”. I show you to be an idiot, your reply is to talk about a different subject.View in discussion
justice gov /usao-mn/pr/feeding-our-future-defendant-sentenced-10-years-prison Put a period between “justice” and “gov” and then in your search bar. For the right-wingers out there, this is a link to a fact stated above.View in discussion
WOW. Just wow. This story comes with a copy of the actual email. What this means is that donnie has the goods on him to make him a puppet.View in discussion
LOOK! My hand is up! In every county, some children enter foster care. Each home where a child is placed is vetted, inspected, and a background check is conducted for every person in that home. They get a check, mine was $720 a month, to provide everything a child needs. Monthly visits to your home, both unscheduled and scheduled, to make sure that your home meets minimums. Every visit, both the child and I were questioned about possible abuse. Other things like the amount and quality of food in the house, clean clothes, school attendance, child seats in the car… this is a long list, are checked. 2View in discussion
My children spoke very poor English, but were citizens from birth. I wanted them to learn two languages, so my wife and I spoke another language around them when they were young.View in discussion
Unaccompanied minors are NEVER illegally detained. They are held in protective custody until a person can make decisions in their best interest. 2View in discussion
Do you ever hear a democrat mention the Americans robbed, raped, and murdered by the illegal criminals other countries sent here just to get rid of them? They don’t want to talk about that. This is because it is overtly false. Every study claims that immigrants, illegal as well, give far more to the USA than average citizens, for less. They use far fewer services than citizens, and they break fewer laws. Your claim that somebody who was an illegal immigrant committed a crime is valid, but it is not a rational comment as to the group you place them in. Your complaint is equivalent to blaming every person in the stadium for the loss of a game. As we see in Minnesota, we’re all being robbed by illegals, and the democrats facilitated it. I assume this line refers to the COVID fraud involving lunches. The guy who was sentenced to 10 years in that conviction was a US citizen. 4View in discussion
They don’t care about those children. Those kids are nothing but political pawns to them. A wild and totally unsubstantiated claim. The article does not say why they can only find 145 of every 300 they placed in homes, but my guess is that they aged out of the system. The ones where the state is paying a family to care for them, they ‘found’ and after they were 18, the family no longer being paid, turned them out. I fail to see how the “leftist political class” can be blamed for this decades-old practice. Then this obscure claim that Apple is somehow a representative of the ” leftist political class” is totally unsupported. What Apple does abroad is China’s business; they are bargaining away their future, poisoning their own house, cheating their population, I think, because those who make the most money from those decisions don’t feel they are impacted by that choice. 3View in discussion
He not only likes her, but he also loves her. She is the perfect right-wing foil. Brown skin, Muslim, far-left, female, well-spoken, popular, and her name is OmarView in discussion
Jesus! you tube—> “He [Epstein] was into the barely legal type, like, he liked 15-year-old girls… I’m not trying to make an excuse for this, I’m just giving you facts” This is a LINK, for you guys on the right.View in discussion
Search youtube for “Megyn Kelly dragged for comment saying Epstein was into ‘barely legal-type'” For those of you on the Right, this is a link. It shows the actual quote on national TV.View in discussion
What it shows is that conspiracy adherents have an extraordinary way of selecting which conspiracies to take up. Against the left, they believe that Omar is the product of immigration fraud who has successfully stolen 3 billion dollars, and one that looks pretty likely, that the president’s son is a foreign agent for cash, they ignore as propaganda.1 View in discussion
Some comments are so insane that it seems rational to assume that posters here are just spoofing the forum. If your comment was sarcasm, put /S after so we all can laugh.View in discussion
His “base” sees these posts not as insane but as running the Left in circles and forcing the Left to watch what the left hand is doing while ignoring what the right is doing.View in discussion
By my calculations, he has less than a year left. Democrats win House and Senate, impeached Feb 3 2026, removed from office March 1. Vance may be sane, but his experience level is low. He is a journalist; he has never run a large organization, never been an employer, and has never been elected.2 View in discussion
No.. Jeeze. Hitler was one of the first environmentalists; he built the first autobahn, and he designed the first car for the everyday man, the Volkswagen. Trump is a universal failure along those lines; he is just incompetent. When the Olympic torch enters the stadium and lights the eternal flame, Hitler invented that bit of theater.View in discussion
He is going to have to prove that the IRS was negligent. He will have to sit through a deposition where nearly anything can be asked.4 View in discussion
My point is, prisons will not imprison you unless a US judge directs them to. “Whose authority?” If they have not yet been convicted in US court, they are entitled to bail.View in discussion
Yes, UPS does ship firearms, but only as a specific contractual service for licensed importers, manufacturers, dealers, and collectors (FFLs), requiring adherence to strict federal, state, and local laws, with handguns needing Next Day Air service, in-person drop-off at a Customer Center (not The UPS Store), verbal declaration, adult signature, and no firearm markings on the package2 View in discussion
Looks like the Trump economy is streamlining business, stopping deliveries for low-end buyers. For donnie, low income is a personality flaw while suggesting any job is better than no job. 4View in discussion
I wonder who is deranged. I am reminded of a song from my youth where the singer suggested her shrink was the person in the wrong when he had just one head, and she had two; everybody knows that two heads are better than one.View in discussion
According to the trump administration, she is not a professional and does not need a license. Google “Under the Trump administration’s “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act (2025), nursing is excluded from the U.S. Department of Education’s updated definition of “professional” programs”View in discussion
I did like the poison ivy suggestion, but it is far more likely that the victim will be your own children or yourself. Way better to just drive slowly whenever you hear a whistle, for caution’s sake. Park in the road until you understand the danger. Highway included. I learned to swear in Spanish, heckling ICE. No better way to waste 6 ICE agents’ time than for them to arrest a US citizen who elects to remain silent. I carry no IDs. I am ret. not that much else to do… I don’t recommend keying ICE rental cars, depleting their budget. I really am against dropping wire “stars” on roadways outside motels. Buying firecrackers in Wyoming and popping 3 off at 2AM in front of motels, and yelling “Gun” is sophomoric. But caution is always the best policy, I drive 45MPH when I am within 25 miles of an ICE detention center, middle lane on the freeway.View in discussion
Classic MAGA as his brother said, “Kazmierczak has been “in and out of treatment since he was a kid.” The brother also described him as being “heavily medicated” and having long-standing issues” 2View in discussion
A wild step up to a US prison than a Mexican one. What is the point? 93 prisoners so far. Isn’t it enough that these guys are in jail already? How can they be jailed in the USA, when they have not been tried in the US? They are entitled to a bond hearing. What kind of a trial would it be? In Spanish, with Mexicans coming to the USA to testify against them? Will they leave their children and family alone and unprotected while they are awaiting trial scheduling for them to take the stand? None of these “cartel members” have buddies who will look for their interests back at home? Esculpitory/defense witnesses must be given the same advantages as those testifying against them, housing,spending money, and a visa? Perhaps immunity? 2View in discussion
You cant sit idly by when your guys are doing it and then get all rightous when you think the other guys are doing it. Ya, you can find your way, you can become educated, you can see a more defined example too. Then I reject that Biden was given any slack in this regard, as I looked and couldn’t find an example you are referring to. “Did Biden arrest reporters who took a counter-Biden stance?” got from google, “Based on available records, there is no evidence that President Joe Biden ordered the arrest of journalists for taking a “counter-Biden” or critical stance. “ Problem in the country now though is we are engaged in a cold civil war and one persons “truth” is not another persons “truth”. I prefer to suggest that we, as a nation, are polarized, and the polarization is fueled by a generalized distrust of the unknown. How could an entire group, nearly half the nation, think that their neighbors are corrupt by the millions because they work for the federal government? Those distrusting people have no idea of what goes on in federal employment, daily.1 View in discussion
I am sure there is something here other than “whataboutism” or deflection. So what, you were unable to enforce what is obviously correct morally with Biden? Now we have to look the other way because it is donnie? What is your point?View in discussion
True. They “made no law”. But selective enforcement is illegal. Using a false claim to enforce an attitude you hold is boldly wrong. The solution is to file a civil case against the offenders. But that is costly, and it is intentionally hard to file suit against government officials. I blame those who holdour public servants to account, the public, and federally, the federal legislature. A more decisive cure exists: VOTE THE BUMS OUT!View in discussion
You reminded me of a song from my youth in which the singer says she is smarter than her shrink because she has two minds, while he only has one. You should consider why you think too many are deranged.2 View in discussion
I am reminded of living abroad, thinking, “How can smart people devise a system that is so obviously wrong?’ Those people abroad were smart, not so much MAGA.View in discussion
habeas corpus. Spelling police, honestly? “hahahaha” Think mirror. Are you limited to spelling, or do you check grammar as well? “…….”View in discussion
GREAT! Fettermqan wants donnie to trim his toenails when he is ignoring the basic tenets of his office. “It will all go away if you blame Christy for this, even though you engineered it right from the start.”View in discussion
I disagree with your conclusions. Different motivations can have similar outcomes. Your claim lacks logical motivation for the typical American. Very hard to get people into the streets, manage compensation, organize administration, make recruiting contacts, and then get them to act with enthusiasm. What would it take for you to support a cause by standing in the street in sub-zero temperatures? How much would you have to pay? What? 50 protesters? If I had $120,000 to spend on such an endeavor, it would be in person with a politician. You can buy any House member with that kind of money.View in discussion
A sane letter, thank you. I did not “exploit” anything. But, “When in Rome, do as the Romans do.” When I see protest signs, I read a lot about being anti ICE, anti donnie, but what I have never seen is one that says “Let in Illegal Immigrants”. Your claim that “ under the last administration which essentially imported millions of illegals who are basically low skilled, uneducated and are a drain on our social systems.” Is unsupported by any facts. The opposite is true; mass deportations were the rule. True, people were able to cross the border illegally, but also true, the administration had a specific budget to combat this problem, and the GOP Congress deliberately did not make it large enough to accomplish its goals. Do you recall the outcry? No, I do not watch FOX. They lie about once every 15 minutes. I hate it when people think I am that dumb. I do though remember the incident, and the threats of jailing Ron for putting people on a bus after promising them free housing and a job [an overt lie]. Those people had a VISA. They were not illegals. I live in a college town/region. Perhaps thousands of foreigners attend one of the 3 colleges near me. This has been my residence for many years, and I have NEVER, not a single time, had a person tell me that they lamented foreigners in their community. Not the slightest bit unusual to hear foreign languages while shopping. Not unusual seeing dress typical of other places across the globe. I have not seen a person in a Taliban Hijab yet, but I know my community, they can dress as they like. I live in Deep red Idaho.View in discussion
Well since the way the laws are being enforced is, well, the law, that is too bad for your protesting friends Too bad for those who wrote those laws and those who make the decisions on how they are interpreted. Well it is understandable why you are opposed to enforcing US immigration laws since you evidently had no problem breaking immigration laws in the Philippines. I evaded the law in the Philippines because that was the system in place. It is cheaper and a whole lot less hassle to just give the immigration officer $200 in your passport. It may be unlawful, but in 30 entries, never had an officer refuse it or not give me a visa that I requested but did not deserve. It was not my country; I had zero allegiance to its laws or its people. This is my country. I want the laws enforced. I want to build America via Immigration. I think that we can select the finest, the best economic deal in people, people who think the US constitution defines US culture and agree that that is the culture they want to assimilate into. That said. When those illegals decided to come to the USA, they knew they were going to break the law and get deported. When they paid somebody to sneak them across the border, they knew they were going to get deported. When they got that job, they knew doing so was illegal and would get deported When they married an American, they knew they would get deported and force their spouse to choose between love and exile. When they had children, they knew that they were creating a one parent family. These people did not come here to be Americans. Make their dreams come true, deport them, jail them.View in discussion
A few points. You have not interviewed every protester, neither have I. but I have taken part in several protests, and far and away those protesters are for enforcing laws. What they are against is the way those laws are enforced. What punishments are given? Is their humanity in the enforcement? What happened to you in Germany. I too have worked through immigration and visa hassles abroad. I had a friend who snuck into Saba, Northeast Borneo. Had a GF there. When he was arrested, he was held 2 weeks in his underwear behind a chain link fence and given only unclean water to drink. Slept on the ground. Deported via an open tanker bin to the Philippines. He was not in Kansas anymore, as you were not when you were in Germany. I lived in the Philippines for 21 years, and I lied on nearly every visa application I filed. Never got caught.View in discussion
People are NOT rational. Occasionally true. The cure remains the same. These people did not, on the spur of the moment, get dressed for sub-zero temps and then stand in the cold, bored out of their minds, day after day.View in discussion
“They ARE ABSOLUTELY ALLOWED TO ASSUME THAT THEIR LIVES ARE AT RISK.” Yes, they are “allowed,” but they are not “allowed” to make any assumption unjustified by the facts, when viewed in retrospect or primarily to make a false conclusion. This guy having a lawful gun in his hip pocket was a threat to nobody. It is rational that any person who sees a protester is to not assume he is carrying an atomic bomb in his pickup. Their assumptions have to be based in provable facts. Actual observations. Alternative solutions considered. NO! You cannot machine gun people on the sidewalk when an officer thinks a guy’s wallet in his hip pocket looks like a gun. Their are other options. TRAINING gives those officers those options.View in discussion
You are arguing a different point than I am. Why did this escalate? As to your point, perhaps not while donnie is president, but each and every one of those officers will come before 12 people who are just everyday citizens. They will look at the evidence frame by frame while wondering if a sophisticated, well-trained officer would have discharged his weapon. I am sure that somebody will bring up that panic is justified after somebody says the word “gun”. This is the system that exists in the USA. Those officers were trained. They knew the repercussions for discharging their weapons; they knew that administrations change. May god Have Mercy on their souls, and may HE speak to every juror who sees himself as the guy who is shot.View in discussion
A CNN reporter is a “violent mob”? The videos showed no violence, at all. Perhaps you can post a link to “Violence” you see. I will discount it as one incident of lawfulness, and will post a link to a video that IS UNLAWFUL use of force.View in discussion
Define OK. I have seen ICE bear-spray bystanders. I have seen them tear-gass CNN reporters. I have seen them use clubs in crowd control.View in discussion
Here is the conflict. You are making apoint that perhaps a crime was committed, and that is 100% irrelevant. The penalty in the USA is that persons who are suspected of a crime face due process. That due process involves a series of events, none of which include summary execution. ICE are federal representative of the court. Their sole job is to bring evidence and persons to the court. Each time they fail to do this, they have failed at their job. We know police work. We have seen it in action our whole lives. How many times have you seen the Highway Patrol tear-gas somebody? The local Sheriff? Why, when they are doing essentially the same job, are the interactions with the general public so radically different? TRAINING.View in discussion
Every person in the USA is innocent until he is proven otherwise in a court of law. So, your deflection is irrelevant. The penalty for being a suspect is nothing. It is a deflection, because the issue here is why this man was shot.1 View in discussion
Well, you have owned the libs. You have made a random true statement and extrapolated that every other argument is false. No, they do not have an unlimited discretion to interpret any act as something else and use it as an excuse to harass people exercising their constitutional rights.View in discussion
Oh? Is that where and how you learned to enforce laws? you don’t have a F’n clue Then explain in a way an officer of the court would? Or were you just making random points to own the libs? I claim you have a right to remain silent, to not incriminate yourself. not to be punished for asserting your constitutional rights. Tell me officer, is it not true? Although some states require you to give your name and date of birth, a federal officer does not have jurisdiction to enforce that state law. TRUE OR FALSE? When I told you that “I got this information from GOOGLE, that is a link. That means that yhou should show another link that shows GOOGLE as you put it “don’t have a F’n clue’. I will remind you that you could have cut and pasted this claim to verify it. Not only that you could have scrolled down and asked where Google got its information. So, your response was so unprofessional, so wildly lacking in the basic information ANY officer would know as it is the basis of his job, I say you are a LIAR.View in discussion
You tried this already with Hunter and I proved it wasn’t true… No, you made a true statement, then extrapolated that it was a general conspiracy directed by the president of the USA, 100% without reference. One true statement does not make every following statement true. What we have here is a deflection. When you are called on a lie, you start making true statements to shift the conversation to an issue where you can claim “I was correct”. You have not shown that any Democratic president refused to prosecute an offender who had obvious lawlessness despite pleas for him to do so.View in discussion
Same with dems…..just mention any dem named in the Epstein files and they never say this…it’s always “well if they are guilty”….but with repubs they are always just guilty… I see no effort by any recent Democrat president to hinder or ignore a person who has been indicted. Perhaps you can give examples of what you are talking about. The comments we are discussing. I am talking about the president, or any sitting federal elected official, directing a cover-up, a delay tactic, a refusal to pursue an obvious criminal act, who was a representative of the Democratic party. Your reply is, to the best of my knowledge today, an accurate timeline. What it does not say is that “Biden Ordered”. It says they used caution. WHO WOULD NOT? It says it “dragged on,” perhaps it did, but the goal is not to let anybody suggest they were railroaded. Today the President and his staff are undermining investigations into claims of Murder. Brandishing firearms. Assult. OPENLY.1 View in discussion
My claim, “I see no effort by any recent Democrat president to hinder or ignore a person who has been indicted. Perhaps you can give examples of what you are talking about.” yhou gave a fairly accurate chain of events regarding the prosecution of the president’s son. Not a single allegation shows a direct tie to the president of the USA. So, your suggestion “lol…Hunter Biden is the example…
They tried not to indict him remember?? Seems either false or a deflection.2 View in discussion
Seriously. Those officers are agents of the state. Their job is to give people due process and enforce laws via due process. They do not have a mandate to enforce laws that do not exist. There is no law against speaking in any way to an officer of the court.1 View in discussion
An overstatement. True, the FBI held the laptop and refused to release any information about it. They refused to discount the story that it was “Russian disinformation.” Former members of the CIA also remarked that “It looked like and could be Russian disinformation”. NOBODY in government said it was unequivocally Russian disinformation. FB and Twitter both have policies for guarding against disinformation. Some links to unproven stories were blocked. The Biden administration did not select which stories were disinformation, or somehow coerce FB or Twitter to ban any link. Those links are no longer blocked.View in discussion
They censored, shut down, and banned millions of people who dared to even question the vaccines, A bold claim. I googled it and got no responses supporting it. Perhaps I did not know what to enter into the query space.View in discussion
A few House members are trying to correct America’s blunder, but the majority refuse to remove a servant of the public who does not know the scope of his office nor the implications of his oath of office. One solution remains. VOTE THE BUMS OUT OF OFFICE.
‘Hi, my name is Kyle, I’m Antifa, and there’s so much rage in me that I’ve had to record this like 15 times trying to get the message out,’ he said in one now-deleted video made the day of Pretti’s killing.
‘It’s time to suit up, boots on the ground,’ he added. ‘No, not talking about peaceful protests anymore.
‘We’re not talking about having polite conversations anymore…. This is not a f***ing joke. There’s nothing fun to chant about it. Get your f***ing guns and stop these f***ing people.’
An anti-ICE activist using the handle Vitalist International posted on X recently that ‘Minneapolis could be our Fallujah,’ referencing the bloodiest battle of the Iraq War.
stock here: near and dear to my heart….Wisconsin, and Ghost Evers….lying through his arse to say he signed law to prevent property tax increases for 400 years….everything I know is that opposite is true….he guaranteed annual property tax increases for 400 years….the 400 is just abusive, no other purpose for some an outrageous long term. Learned helplessness is part of what they want. They want your soul, they want to take away your humanity, then they will keep the desirable sex slave with proper attitudes, and some robot tenders. Farming will resemble Idiocracy with GPS driven machine, on nutrient lacking “soil” aka lifeless dirt type substance.
I did get the MP4, it was coded from X, and took some work with AI help, but straight forward and worked….Whisper took a long time to download and install, but now it is there….pro grade transcription and time stamping.
——————– Gold standard command line once you have the MP4
whisper *.mp4 –model medium –word_timestamps True –condition_on_previous_text False
Option 5 — yt-dlp + Whisper (gold standard)
If you do this often.
yt-dlp <x_video_url>
whisper *.mp4 --model medium
Produces:
Full transcript
Timestamps
Speaker-segmented text (with larger models)
——————————-
Getting the MP4 is more complex, seem many new videos hide it with a 4 digit extension…..
Method 1 (Best / Most Reliable): yt-dlp Works even when X tries to obfuscate streams. Install Windows
winget install yt-dlp macOS
brew install yt-dlp Download the MP4
yt-dlp https://x.com/Luca5898425421/status/2017082520769065272 By default, yt-dlp: Selects the best video + audio Merges into MP4 if possible Force MP4 (if needed)
Method 2: Extract MP4 from Page HTML (No tools, more manual) Works if the MP4 URL is exposed. Steps Open the tweet in desktop browser Press F12 → Network tab Reload page Filter by: mp4 OR video.twimg.com Look for URLs like:
https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/.../vid/1280x720/....mp4 Right-click → Open in new tab Save video ⚠️ Many newer X videos don’t expose a clean MP4 anymore (HLS .m3u8 instead).
Method 3: Download via .m3u8 Stream (Advanced HTML method) If you see .m3u8 instead of MP4: Copy the .m3u8 URL, then:
yt-dlp "<m3u8-url>" -o video.mp4 or with ffmpeg:
ffmpeg -i "<m3u8-url>" -c copy video.mp4
Method 4: Online Downloaders (Fast, Least Reliable) Examples (use cautiously): twdown.net sssTwitter snaptwitter Pros No install Cons Often fail Ads / trackers Break frequently Only recommended for non-critical clips.
Method 5: “Air-Gap” Capture (Always Works) If everything else fails. Play the video on: Phone / tablet / secondary PC Record audio/video on your main computer: OBS Windows Game Bar Save as MP4 Transcribe This bypasses all DRM / obfuscation.
What I Recommend for You Given your workflow (fact-checking, transcription, archival): Use yt-dlp every time. It’s the same tool journalists and OSINT researchers rely on. Once you have the MP4:
whisper video.mp4 --model medium Paste the transcript here and I’ll verify every factual claim, including the property-tax statement, against primary sources.
stock here: my take last year was his plan was guaranteed property tax increases, maybe limited by an inflation index. He is going to halt sales tax (like 6%) on diapers and insulin, but not on food. Wow.
Chime in. Obviously I have a down day, which is nice, vacationing is hard work. Disneyland tomorrow.
stock here: noted in the comment, some pretend that Mearsheimer is suggesting that Russia may use nukes….he did not make that insinuation at all. When I first saw that I thought Mearsheimer was losing touch….that is not the case. Here is a summary
——————————
—————————–
The host frames the moment as “90% toward a peace deal” but questions whether there’s any real progress on the harder piece: security guarantees.
Lavrov’s “90% of what?” reaction is used as a tell: Russia is signaling it doesn’t recognize the West’s “nearly done” narrative and is still anchored to its June 2024 position.
Mearsheimer calls the “90%” talk Kabuki theater: PR meant to create hope and sustain support, not evidence of converging negotiating positions.
He argues the West mislabels the “last issue” as territory, when Russia’s core issue is NATO / NATO-like guarantees (Article 5 by another name).
On territory, he says Russia’s stated demand is not just Donbas—it includes Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, with Ukraine required to fully withdraw from those oblasts Russia claims/annexed.
A prior “only one issue left” claim (from a U.S. envoy/figure in the discussion) is treated as misleading, because Russia’s package is usually described as multiple linked conditions (neutrality/no NATO; force limits; “denazification” rhetoric; territorial outcomes).
Zelensky’s public line—no concessions, not even Donbas—is presented as further evidence that any “we’re almost there” story is detached from reality.
On “U.S. security guarantees are 100% agreed”: Mearsheimer says Washington’s silence matters, and U.S. strategy documents point toward shifting burdens to Europe and pivoting attention to East Asia, not formal Ukraine guarantees.
He distinguishes Russia’s 2022 “Istanbul” notion of guarantees as “common” guarantees (Russia included, with a veto on troop deployments) versus Zelensky’s desired bilateral U.S.–Ukraine guarantee (Russia excluded). Russia rejects the latter.
He says diplomacy is mostly a PR war running alongside battlefield operations; a real settlement, if it comes, is more likely an armistice / frozen conflict driven by battlefield facts (he cites Korea 1953 as an analogy), not a comprehensive peace deal now. Russia also rejects a ceasefire-first approach.
On why today differs from Istanbul 2022: he argues Ukraine would have gotten a better deal earlier; Russia is now more entrenched (four annexations claimed) and relations with Europe are more poisonous, pushing expectations toward a long “frozen conflict.”
He interprets Russia’s ongoing campaign (especially energy infrastructure strikes) as consistent with preparing for prolonged conflict and increasing coercive pressure—possibly driven by war duration/costs and internal pressure on Putin to “get tougher.”
Nukes—where he says the escalatory danger sits: he points to mainstream Russian strategist Sergey Karaganov arguing Russia should consider using nuclear weapons to end the war, and says that if 2026 resembles 2025 (attrition grind), pressure on Putin to escalate beyond conventional strikes could grow.
Nukes—his “attrition” logic that links to escalation: he frames the war primarily as attrition, not territorial speed; if Russia can’t “finish” Ukraine with conventional means soon, the incentive to seek a decisive break increases. He explicitly doesn’t claim nukes will happen, but flags the fact that serious elites are advocating them as a warning sign of how the conflict could become much more dangerous if the stalemate persists.
stock here: “They” love weak males. So one of their strategies is to pretend that being a SIMP just means than a male does not give up on multiple advances to a female. That in itself is bad enough….if there is no “click” if there is no mutual attraction and interest, then leave her the fuck alone.
In reality SIMP is far worse than just that. I have approved the SIMP memes at the far bottom, check it out, and comment.
It also applies to males in on-going relationships. The NWO wants males to cater to and basically beg females for every approval, including sex. At the Tokyo sky tower, I tnoticed a “stylish” male with a decent looking female, they were taking up a prime spot for photography. She proceeded to take 30 minutes of selfies in every way possible, whilst ignoring the real show of Tokyo in the Golden Hour and Blue Hour. He did nothing to dissuade her, then I noticed he was carrying her Gucci purse. My God, and she wasn’t that hot. He either had real money or spent beyond his means for his own clothes and shoes….so he wasn’t punching above his weight, he was just a sad little SIMP, doing whatever to allow his date to be an self obsessed idiot. This is SIMP.
I don’t know this site, but it is misguided at best…..
This would be very rare is Japanese society, where the male would completely defer to the female being self possessed and rude to those around them. But the direction for Japanese society is also not good.
Example: At the Hot Springs (Onsen) ALL Japanese men shown to be at least flabby, often fat and saggy. This makes it hard for women to respect them…times are a changing.
And compared to my last visit, keeping in mind this is quite winter time and daily lows being close to 32F or even below. Last night there were flurries in Tokyo. But the percentage of people who can “scrub up” nicely on a daily basis, i.e. look good, is down at least 50%. Many females have put on enough weight to be considered fat.
Areas of Tokyo are over run with Arab “migrants” and other races that share nothing in common with the Japanese….I knew this was a plot, but I didn’t know it was already succeeding, just like the Somali Beach Head in Minneapolis. Japanese nice, is kind of like Minnesota nice, but when you push them too far, I think you will find a wild reaction…perhaps the new Female PM, who faces a re-election in Feb will be able to wrestling into control before and all out confrontation ensues. I doubt it….the powers that be are waging war against this Based Female PM. Most people really like her.
There is another false SIMP meme….that doing anything nice for a girl makes you a simp. uh, no.
stock here: this guy is entertaining, his voice is better than AI generated LOL. I think I got this from Cuttlefish….so hat tip. Think of an alternative to Alex and the Duran.
stock here: last year I posted on a Beta Test I was conducting.
We are literally beings of light. There are signally pathways in the human body that utilize light, and why wouldn’t they? Light is another tool of command, control, and adaptation. Did they teach you this in school, even human biology? Methinks not.
Results, within about 2 week, daily exposure to diffuse 2 wave-length red light significantly improved near vision in low light conditions (think filling out forms at the Bank). I had 2 suspected 35 watt red light panel hung above my workstation, maybe 4 feet from eyes, and exposed say 3 to 6 hours per day.
Results: what would have definitely required readers before, after 2 weeks, required no readers. The red light creates extra energy within the eye that makes everything work better. Do your own research, this is not medical advice.
I also bought a wrap around red light device for knee in particular but can be applied elsewhere, and that seemed to help knee….in fact I would say definitely helped (although other later found mitigating {think management, not cure} factors, seemed to almost a “cure” after walking 1.5 to 4 miles per day in Japan, up and down steps with 18 kG luggage and a 14 pound camera bag mostly on the back in a well placed and balanced camera bag <again, A-Eye enhancement bakku management really helped).
The IT band in the leg is critical, and I guarantee you the medical community will let you down, or at least greatly delay a solution, IF YOU LET THEM. More on that later.
——————————————— Orig Article from fall 2025
stock here: Been on my radar for half a year, finally making some progress. These were pretty cheap on Amazon, $29. The manual is definitely Chinese LOL. I am not sure I can adapt these units to eye improvement, LOL they come with eye blockers like a tanning salon
A-Eye, LOL
via red light therapy, and talk about the wavelengths too ChatGPT said: ChatGPT
Recent scientific studies have explored the potential of red light therapy to improve eyesight, particularly in mitigating age-related visual decline. This therapy involves exposing the eyes to specific wavelengths of deep red light, which may enhance mitochondrial function in retinal cells.
Key Findings:
Improved Retinal Function: A study by University College London found that a single three-minute exposure to 670-nanometer (nm) deep red light in the morning led to a 17% improvement in color contrast vision among participants. This enhancement persisted for at least a week.
ucl.ac.uk
Mitochondrial Enhancement: The retina's photoreceptor cells, which have high energy demands, experience a decline in mitochondrial function with age. Exposure to long-wavelength red light (650–900 nm) has been shown to improve mitochondrial performance, increasing energy (ATP) production and reducing oxidative stress.
nature.com
Timing of Exposure: The benefits of red light therapy appear to be time-dependent. Morning exposure between 8 AM and 9 AM was effective, while afternoon exposure did not yield significant improvements. This suggests that the therapy's efficacy may be linked to the body's circadian rhythms.
ucl.ac.uk
Mechanism:
Mitochondria in retinal cells absorb specific wavelengths of red light, leading to enhanced energy production. This process helps counteract age-related declines in vision by improving the function of photoreceptor cells responsible for color vision and low-light adaptation. aao.org
Considerations:
Wavelength Specificity: The therapeutic effects are most pronounced with deep red light around 670 nm. Other wavelengths within the 650–900 nm range may also be beneficial, but 670 nm has been the primary focus in recent studies.
nature.com
Safety and Accessibility: The studies utilized low-power LED devices for light exposure, which are considered safe for retinal health. This non-invasive approach could lead to affordable, home-based therapies for individuals experiencing age-related visual decline.
ucl.ac.uk
While these findings are promising, further research is necessary to fully understand the long-term effects and optimal protocols for red light therapy in vision improvement. Individuals interested in this therapy should consult with eye care professionals before initiating treatment.
stock here: alot of people get far more than 6000 hits a day, but still….if one is generating “content” and getting 6000 hits….then truth is getting out. Nukepro has been attacked several times over the years. At one point I moved my work to Deeper Dive Data, and that was successful for quite a while, until they found me and determine that I must be shut up at any cost. A friend is talking about the danger of the COVID injections, and how the MN “mostly peaceful but deadly” protests, are far from organic. He is getting 30,000 plus hits on some posts….I get 8. He mostly does not create new content, but comments on other’s content. No shade on him, anyone bringing truth to many are great people.
He also has a family house on the big island and is visiting the Pele fest. I hope to go in late February.
That s kind of weird isn’t it? 2026 shall be my year I am sure of it….accomplish and finish projects, focus on priorities, but still try to get the word out….broadly again.
Badge of honor….to be heavily shadow banned on multiple platforms….LOL.
I was posting articles like this when the additional shadow ban happened.
China Brings Back the “Over Flowing Death” Meme, More BS from the Chi-Coms
stock here: remember when in early 2020 China was releasing videos of people dropping dead on the spot, while walking down the street, and bodies just strewn about the streets, and hospital hallways filled with body bags wide shut?
Well we are back to that same bullshit. For them….it worked the first time.
stock here, in a totally absurd move, the Demolition Contractor that bought the Palisades to scrap it….is now trying to restart the plant, even though they have no skill in such an event. Especially a run down Mark 1 plant, that was slum lorded into it final years. It was not “Wet Setup” to mitigate damage for a potential restart, and the drive turbine was not set into “slow turn” to prevent flat spots and shaft bend, on this 100′ long 1 Million pound component.
Arnie is the chief consultant, and his testimony is credible and easy to understand. Check it out.
The NRC licensed the Palisades reactor to operate until 2031, despite Palisades having been approved long ago by the old AEC and not meeting current operational, metallurgical, or electrical standards. Palisades was closed in 2022 and sold for scrap before its 2031 license extension expired. Entergy, its owner at the time, determined there would be no profit to its corporation if it completed the required safety and operational improvements to the facility.
Some of you may remember “loosenuke” coined as a nukist….
stock here: A-Eye assist as html….hope it works as requested. Arnie is in his late 70’s, he is aging out gracefully, but he never sold out by stepping away from truth, he never chased the “likes”, good on him!
What happened to Arnie Gundersen (the radiation/nuclear risk expert)?
In short: nothing “mysterious.” He didn’t vanish—he largely shifted from constant TV-era commentary (especially during Fukushima’s peak media years)
to quieter work: education, consulting, and sworn technical filings in regulatory/legal proceedings.
Arnie Gundersen (photo hosted by Fairewinds “About Us” page).
Maggie Gundersen (photo hosted by Fairewinds “About Us” page).
Why you don’t hear him as much anymore
The news cycle moved on. Fukushima coverage dropped sharply after the initial years, and engineering-heavy analysis doesn’t “trend.”
He kept working—just not in the attention economy. Fairewinds publishes analysis, talks, and backgrounders rather than chasing daily headlines.
Age matters. He’s now in his late 70s, so output tends to be more selective and purpose-driven (testimony, curated briefings, longer-form pieces).
His Fukushima focus (what he stayed known for)
Gundersen’s most persistent technical emphasis around Fukushima was not “temple talk” or vague fear—he repeatedly drilled into
specific failure modes and consequence pathways, especially:
Spent fuel pool risk (Unit 4 was the public flashpoint early on):
he addressed Unit 4 spent fuel pool condition and risk in a 2012 Japan symposium-style presentation hosted by Fairewinds.
Ongoing uncertainty / narrative control:
he later argued that institutional “framing” and information control shaped how the world interpreted the disaster and its continuing consequences.
California CPUC / Diablo Canyon (2017):
direct testimony PDF widely mirrored online (often referenced as expert testimony rather than “media commentary”).
Direct Testimony (PDF, 2017)
Fairewinds long-form pieces (public-facing but still technical)
Japan’s Nuclear Cover-up Continues (2020):
an example of later-phase Fukushima commentary framed around institutional messaging and continuing consequences.
Fairewinds article (2020-03-10)
Fukushima Daiichi: The Truth and the Future (2012):
includes direct Q&A addressing Unit 4 spent fuel pool concerns.
Fairewinds presentation page (2012)
Podcasts / audio archive:
the ongoing Fairewinds podcast stream (episodes vary; use as a timeline anchor).
Fairewinds Podcast Archive
Bottom line
Gundersen as “everywhere,” was largely the 2011–2015 media window. Since then, he’s been more present in
regulatory filings, structured presentations, and Fairewinds’ long-form output than in mainstream broadcast rotation.
For your blog credibility, the NRC PDFs and sworn declarations are the cleanest “substantive work” citations.
stock here: The real story here is NOT the accelerating loss of magnetic shield, but the main stream “take”on things. I’ll explain more after I post the backgrounders. Here is Ben Davidson, seems like he is back in his Mojo flow. LOL A-Eye first downplays the effect of the last weeks super high 10MEV Proton influx….and then once I provide more…it confirms exactly that…..that’s at the far bottom
aurora is usually red and green, but there was a lot of blue in last weeks aurora, thinking the earth weakening mag field is a contributor, deep dive on known science.Thought for 21s
Blue/purple aurora is real physics — but most of the time it’s not telling you “the geomagnetic field suddenly got weaker last week.” It’s mainly telling you something about (1) which atmospheric species were excited, (2) at what altitude, and (3) how energetic the precipitation/heating was, plus (4) what your camera sensor did to the color balance.
1) What sets aurora color (the core physics)
Aurora is light from excited atoms/molecules relaxing after collisions driven by incoming charged particles (mostly electrons) or strong ionospheric currents.
Green (most common)
Atomic oxygen O(¹S→¹D) at 557.7 nm (“green line”).
Typically strongest in the ~100–150 km region (often quoted ~110–120 km in statistical studies).
Red (often diffuse, higher)
Atomic oxygen O(¹D→³P) at 630.0 nm (“red line”).
Favored at higher altitude (~200–300+ km) where collisions are rarer, so the long-lived excited state can radiate instead of being quenched.
Blue / violet
Dominated by molecular nitrogen ion N₂⁺ “first negative” band, especially 427.8 nm (deep blue/violet).
Produced by more energetic electron precipitation and/or certain scattering processes; it’s a standard auroral emission line family.
Blue emissions often peak at similar “E-region” heights (~100–120 km), but they tend to “pop” when the energy spectrum favors N₂⁺ excitation or when the event geometry/intensity makes it visible.
Magenta / pink
Usually a mix: red oxygen + blue/violet N₂⁺ can look magenta.
There are recent peer-reviewed analyses of “magenta/blue-dominant” mid-latitude aurora tied to strong storms and N₂⁺ emissions.
2) Why you saw “a lot of blue” last week
In practice it’s usually a combination of these:
A) The event had a harder (more energetic) particle spectrum
Higher-energy electrons penetrate deeper (denser air) and can enhance N₂ / N₂⁺ emissions (blue/violet) relative to oxygen green/red. Blue at 427.8 nm is specifically associated with N₂⁺ excitation by energetic electrons (and in some contexts resonant scattering).
B) You may have been seeing STEVE (purple/white ribbon) mixed with aurora
A lot of people describe “weird blue/purple” nights that are actually STEVE (a subauroral arc) and its green ‘picket fence’ structures, which is distinct from normal aurora curtains and tied to intense ionospheric flows/heating (SAID), not the usual auroral oval precipitation picture.
C) Cameras strongly over-report blue/purple compared to your eyes
Even if you “saw” blue, it’s common that the camera made it look much bluer because of:
Long exposure (seconds) integrating faint 427.8 nm light
So “blue-dominant in photos” can happen even when the human-eye impression is mostly green.
3) Does a weakening geomagnetic field make aurora “bluer”?
Not directly in the way people usually mean it.
What’s well-supported:
Earth’s dipole moment has been decreasing ~5–7% per century since ~1840 (order-of-magnitude; different reconstructions vary), and the field has become more asymmetric (e.g., South Atlantic Anomaly).
A weaker dipole changes the coupled magnetosphere–ionosphere–thermosphere system (how currents close, how the atmosphere responds over long time scales).
What it doesn’t imply:
It does not mean that a specific week’s storm becomes “blue” because the main field weakened recently. Main-field evolution is slow, and storm-time aurora color ratios are dominated by storm driver + particle energy + altitude chemistry + viewing/sensor effects.
Where weakening could matter (second-order effects):
Over decades/centuries, a weaker field can slightly alter where aurora is possible (equatorward boundary statistics), and it can influence radiation belt/precipitation access in certain regions. That’s a “probabilistic geography” effect, not “blue vs green” on a given night.
Bottom line: blue aurora is mostly an “energy/altitude/species + camera” story, not a “field collapse” signature. The field trend is real, but it’s not the clean lever for the color you saw.
4) How to sanity-check what you saw (quick diagnostics)
If you want to interpret your own photos like a scientist:
Purple ribbon east–west, narrow, equatorward of main aurora → likely STEVE.
Magenta wash → mixed emissions; modern analyses explicitly connect magenta/blue dominance to N₂⁺ bands under storm conditions.
—————————-
Aurora, Protons, and Magnetosphere: Four Key Q&A
How much does ionospheric conductivity change during SEP (>10 MeV proton) events?
During SEP events, increased proton precipitation dramatically raises ionization in the polar ionosphere, especially in the D- and E-regions. This can increase Pedersen and Hall conductivities by factors of 2–10 locally, reducing effective resistance and allowing much stronger field‑aligned and horizontal currents to flow. This enhanced conductivity conditions the ionosphere for stronger auroral currents rather than discharging it.
How do electron aurora and proton aurora differ spectrally and physically?
Electron aurora dominate visible displays and produce the familiar green (557.7 nm oxygen), red (630.0 nm oxygen), and blue/violet (N₂⁺ at 427.8 nm) emissions. Proton aurora occur when precipitating protons undergo charge‑exchange, becoming fast neutral hydrogen atoms that later emit Balmer‑series hydrogen light (often faint and reddish). Proton aurora mainly modify ionization and conductivity; electrons do most of the visible glowing.
What role do Birkeland (field‑aligned) currents play in aurora?
Birkeland currents are large electrical currents flowing along Earth’s magnetic field lines between the magnetosphere and ionosphere. Downward currents accelerate electrons into the upper atmosphere, creating aurora, while upward currents carry ions away. These currents maintain charge separation, transport energy, and couple solar‑wind power into atmospheric light and heating.
How do geomagnetic storms induce currents in the ground?
Rapid changes in ionospheric and magnetospheric currents during storms create time‑varying magnetic fields. By electromagnetic induction, these changes drive telluric (ground‑induced) currents in the Earth’s crust and in long conductors such as power lines and pipelines. This is why geomagnetic storms can stress power grids and why surface–ionosphere electrical coupling is a real engineering concern.
stock here: I’ll do a full report on Fuji, once back in my main office. Before you start ragging that this is WTMI, way too much information, keep in mind, for me too….this blog started as my scrap book to log interesting information so I didnt lose it or it wasn’t memory holed by that questionable technocrats that be.
Curious that the deeper you dig, the deeper the hole, LOL. The great 1707 Earthquake of Japan, about 8.6 or so, was exactly 49 days before the greatest known eruption of Fuji. Odd number. I copied a lengthy discussion from a new to me website. At the far bottom. He ties in big events and a 179 year solar cycle.
The angle of repose, means the slope angle. Fuji is really sloped. A-Eye background information——
—————————-
1. Mount Fuji — material makeup & mechanics
Fuji is a basaltic-andesitic stratovolcano
Fuji is compositionally intermediate, not purely basaltic.
Typical magma chemistry
Basaltic andesite → andesite
~52–60% SiO₂
Higher Al₂O₃, Fe, Mg than continental andesites
Moderate dissolved volatiles (H₂O, CO₂)
Key structural components
Fuji is a layer cake of:
Scoria and cinder fall
Ash (tephra)
Agglutinate
Interbedded lava flows
Reworked volcaniclastic debris
This is crucial.
Why Fuji is so steep (high angle of repose)
Not because lava is stable—but because the mountain is mostly granular solids, not lava sheets.
Mechanics
Scoria & ash behave like angular frictional materials
High internal friction angle (≈30–40°)
Repeated explosive eruptions pile loose material directly on flanks
Lava flows act as cementing ribs, not the bulk mass
Fuji is mechanically closer to a giant sand pile with lava buttresses than a lava shield.
2. Kilauea — material makeup & mechanics
Pure tholeiitic basalt
~48–50% SiO₂
Extremely low viscosity
Low volatile retention
Hot (~1150–1200 °C)
Depositional style
Effusive, not explosive
Lava flows travel kilometers before cooling
Minimal tephra accumulation
Resulting geometry
Slopes: 2–5°
Shield shape governed by lava rheology, not repose
Lava spreads until gravitational stress < yield stress
Kīlauea is a fluid-dynamics problem, not a granular mechanics problem.
3. Mauna Loa — material makeup & mechanics
Even purer basalt than Kīlauea
Massive volume
Extremely hot, low-viscosity magma
Minimal explosive behavior
Slope mechanics
Slopes: 3–6°
Built almost entirely from overlapping lava sheets
Angle limited by flow length, not pile stability
Mauna Loa is effectively a planetary-scale lava pancake stack.
4. Direct comparison — materials science view
Feature
Mount Fuji
Kīlauea
Mauna Loa
Volcano type
Stratovolcano
Shield
Shield
Dominant material
Ash, scoria, lava
Lava
Lava
SiO₂
52–60%
48–50%
48–50%
Viscosity
Moderate
Very low
Very low
Eruption style
Explosive + effusive
Effusive
Effusive
Angle of repose
30–35°
~5°
~5°
Governing physics
Granular friction
Lava rheology
Lava rheology
5. Addressing your hypothesis directly
“Since the angle of repose is so high on Fuji, it seems to be made of stable basaltic magma, slow cooled in many instances.”
Correction with nuance:
Fuji’s steepness is not due to slow-cooled basalt
It is due to repeated explosive deposition of granular volcanics
Basaltic lava alone cannot build steep slopes
Slow cooling matters locally (lava ribs), but not globally
Key insight
Fuji stands tall because it throws rocks into the air and lets them fall where they land. Hawaiian volcanoes pour syrup downhill until it stops.
Mount Fuji is a friction-dominated granular pile reinforced by lava ribs, while Kīlauea and Mauna Loa are viscosity-dominated lava accumulators constrained by fluid mechanics.
If you want, next we can:
Quantify repose angles vs grain size & vesicularity
Compare Fuji to Mount St. Helens or Etna
Or model slope stability under seismic loading
sure what other volcanos are kind of like fuji, and indicate their angle of repose
Below are volcanoes that are genuinely “Fuji-like” in materials, construction mechanics, and slope behavior, followed by typical flank angles (angle of repose / effective slope). Values are ranges because these edifices are composite structures (lava + tephra), not single-material piles.
What “Fuji-like” means (mechanically)
A volcano earns this label if it has:
Basaltic-andesite to andesite magma
Frequent explosive (Strombolian–Vulcanian) phases
Large volumes of scoria, ash, and agglutinate
Interbedded lava ribs (structural reinforcement)
Steep, symmetric cone morphology
These are granular-friction–dominated edifices, not lava-flow–dominated shields.
Prime Fuji analogs (ranked)
Mount Mayon
Angle of repose:35–40° Why it’s the closest match:
Often cited as the most perfect cone on Earth
Basaltic-andesite magma
Thick scoria blankets + lava buttressing
Extremely steep, metastable slopes
➡ Mechanically the closest cousin to Fuji.
Mount Etna
Angle of repose:30–35° Notes:
Basaltic but volatile-rich
Continuous cone rebuilding
Multiple parasitic cones
Slightly broader than Fuji but similar physics
Mount Merapi
Angle of repose:32–38° Key difference:
Andesitic
Lava dome growth + collapse
Pyroclastic density currents reset slopes frequently
➡ Fuji without the symmetry, but with higher instability.
Mount Vesuvius
Angle of repose:30–34° Notes:
Composite cone inside Somma caldera
High tephra fraction
Comparable repose but smaller scale
Mount Hood
Angle of repose:28–33° Notes:
Andesitic
More erosion and glacial modification
Structurally similar but older and weathered
Mount St. Helens (pre-1980)
Angle of repose:30–35° Important caveat:
Prior to sector collapse
Demonstrates the failure mode of Fuji-type edifices
Quick comparison table
Volcano
Magma type
Dominant material
Typical flank angle
Mount Fuji
Basaltic-andesite
Scoria + ash + lava
30–35°
Mount Mayon
Basaltic-andesite
Scoria-dominated
35–40°
Mount Etna
Basaltic (volatile-rich)
Lava + tephra
30–35°
Mount Merapi
Andesite
Dome + ash
32–38°
Mount Vesuvius
Andesite
Tephra-rich
30–34°
Mount Hood
Andesite
Lava + ash
28–33°
Key physical takeaway (important)
30–40° is not a lava property — it is a granular friction limit.
Once a volcano:
ejects fragmented material
deposits it ballistically
and only later “cements” it with lava
…it becomes angle-of-repose limited, not viscosity-limited.
That is the fundamental distinction between Fuji-type stratocones and Hawaiian shields.
If you want to go deeper next
We can:
Quantify grain size vs repose angle
Compare Fuji vs Mayon stability margins
Model seismic or rainfall-triggered slope failure
Tie this to lahar risk vs shield-volcano flank slumps
———————————-
Below is a chronological list of the last ~10 recognized eruptions of Mount Fuji, ordered most recent → oldest, with each described first by magnitude, then by eruption style / material.
⚠️ Important context up front: Fuji has not erupted since 1707–1708. The record before that becomes increasingly fragmentary, based on tephra layers, lava stratigraphy, and historical chronicles, not continuous observation.
Last 10 eruptions of Mount Fuji
1. 1707–1708 — Hōei Eruption
Magnitude:VEI 5 (large) Nature:
Explosive Plinian–Vulcanian
Massive ash and scoria fall
No summit eruption — lateral flank vents
Ash fell as far as Edo (Tokyo) (~100 km)
Created Hōei Crater on SE flank
Magma: basaltic andesite → andesite
Triggered by the 1707 Hōei megathrust earthquake
➡ This is the defining Fuji eruption and a textbook example of a granular-load–building event that steepened Fuji’s flanks.
2. 1511 — Late medieval eruption
Magnitude:VEI 3–4 (moderate) Nature:
Strombolian to Vulcanian
Scoria cones on upper flanks
Limited lava effusion
Local tephra blankets
3. 1435–1436
Magnitude:VEI 3–4 Nature:
Explosive scoria eruption
Short-lived
Minor lava flows
Tephra-dominated deposition
4. 1300–1301
Magnitude:VEI 4 Nature:
Strong explosive activity
Significant ashfall east of Fuji
Likely multiple vents
Contributed materially to cone steepening
5. 1033
Magnitude:VEI 3–4 Nature:
Strombolian eruption
Scoria accumulation
Minor lava flows
Limited regional impact
6. 937
Magnitude:VEI 4 Nature:
Explosive eruption with widespread tephra
Ash layers identified in surrounding plains
No known large lava flows
7. 864–866 — Jōgan Eruption
Magnitude:VEI 4 (large for Fuji) Nature:
Effusive-dominant basaltic eruption
Produced the Aokigahara lava flow
Lava dammed rivers and formed lakes
Minimal ash compared to Hōei
➡ This eruption flattened local slopes rather than steepening them — the opposite mechanical effect of 1707.
The 1707 Hōei earthquake, which occurred at 14:00 local time on October 28, 1707, was the largest in Japanese history until the 2011 Sendai earthquake surpassed it. It caused moderate to severe damage throughout southwestern Honshu, Shikoku and southeastern Kyūshū. The earthquake and the resulting destructive tsunami, caused more than 5,000 casualties. This event ruptured all of the segments of the Nankai megathrust simultaneously, the only earthquake known to have done this, with an estimated magnitude of 8.6 ML. It may also have triggered the last eruption of Mount Fuji some 49 days later.
Mount Fuji (富士山 Fuji-san?, IPA: [ɸɯꜜdʑisaɴ] ) is the highest mountain in Japan at 3,776.24 m (12,389 ft). An active stratovolcano that last erupted in 1707–08,
The Hōei Eruption of Mount Fuji (Hōei dai funka) started on December 16, 1707 (23rd day of the 11th month of the year Hōei 4) and ended about January 1, 1708 (9th day of the 12th month of the year Hōei 4) during the Edo period. Although it brought no lava flow, the Hoei eruption released some 800 million cubic meters of volcanic ash, which spread over vast areas around the volcano, even reaching Edo almost 100 km away. Cinders and ash fell like rain in Izu, Kai, Sagami, and Musashi provinces.
The eruption occurred on Mount Fuji’s east–north-east flank and formed three new volcanic vents, named No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 Hōei vents. The catastrophe developed over the course of several days—an initial earthquake and explosion of cinders and ash was followed some days later with the more forceful ejections of rocks and stones. Mount Fuji has not erupted since. […] In the year following the Hōei eruption, a secondary disaster occurred when the Sakawa flooded due to sediment build-up resulting from the ash fall.
Volcanic sands fell and widely covered the cultivated fields east of Mount Fuji. To recover the fields farmers cast volcanic products out to dumping-grounds and made sand piles. The rain washed sand piles from the dumping grounds away to the rivers again and again and made some of the rivers shallower, especially into the Sakawa, into which huge volumes of ash fell, resulting in temporary dams. Heavy rainfall on August 7 and 8, 1708, the year following the Hōei eruption, caused an avalanche of volcanic ash and mud and broke the dams, flooding the Ashigara plain.
So, is this perhaps what is yet to come? A large quake closer to Fuji, then a pause, and the giant awakens?
Ash fall and more?
Could there be anything ELSE linked in this kind of chain?
The 1700 Cascadia earthquake was a magnitude 8.7 to 9.2 megathrust earthquake that occurred in the Cascadia subduction zone in 1700. The earthquake involved the Juan de Fuca Plate underlying the Pacific Ocean, from mid-Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada, south along the Pacific Northwest coast as far as northern California, USA. The length of the fault rupture was about 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) with an average slip of 20 meters (22 yards).
The earthquake caused a tsunami that struck the coast of Japan, and may also be linked to the Bonneville slide.
Well, now THAT is an interesting teleconnection…
TWO places having “megaquakes” on the SAME “ring of fire” subduction margin, within 7 years of each other. Then BOTH quiet until now. One, just having given a 9.0 quake.
Next?
The geological record reveals that “great earthquakes” (those with moment magnitude 8 or higher) occur in the Cascadia subduction zone about every 500 years on average, often accompanied by tsunamis. There is evidence of at least 13 events at intervals from about 300 to 900 years with an average of 590 years. Previous earthquakes are estimated to have occurred in 1310 AD, 810 AD, 400 AD, 170 BC and 600 BC.
They have a chart next to the text with the same numbers in it.
So, back at my “solar cycle” spreadsheet, are there any dates close to a “179 year” Solar Cycle (S.C.) count?
600 BC – 665 BC S.C. 170 BC – 128 BC S.C. 400 AD – 409 AD S.C. 810 AD – 767 AD S.C. 1310 AD – 1304 AD S.C. 2011 AD – 2020 AD imputed peak S.C. and B.E. Zero.
These Solar Cycle dates are created by the expedient of just adding 179 repeatedly. Better dates would come from actual cycle data.
BUT, even with these crude methods, it is “odd” that we’re inside 50 years on a lot of those dates, and within single digits on ‘a few’… (And those that are off are off by a very ‘resonant’ quantity…)
Anomalous…
Just sayin… “The facts just are. -E.M.Smith” …. What are the odds?
Update
I’ve added this image so you can see the present “Triad” of mag 6+ quakes all about 50-120 miles from Tokyo…
